By NewsBlogger The Supreme Court’s refusal to accept the unconditional apology from Patanjali co-founder Baba Ramdev and managing director Acharya Balkrishna for advertising medical products in violation of an undertaking has sparked controversy. Justices expressed dissatisfaction and issued contempt notices.
At a glance
- Supreme Court refused an apology from Patanjali co-founder and MD for advertising violations.
- Contempt notices were issued against Patanjali Ayurved and the managing director.
- The court criticized the State Licensing Authority for not taking action against violations.
- Call for accountability from District Ayurvedic and Unani Officers in Haridwar.
- The importance of upholding the law and transparency in healthcare advertising is emphasized.
The details
The Supreme Court’s refusal to accept the unconditional apology from Patanjali co-founder Baba Ramdev and managing director Acharya Balkrishna for advertising medical products in violation of an undertaking given in November 2023 has sparked controversy.
Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah expressed dissatisfaction with the apology, deeming the violations deliberate and willful.
Contempt Notices Issued
Contempt notices were issued against Patanjali Ayurved and Mr. Balkrishna on February 27, with the contempt of court case scheduled for April 16. State Licensing Authority officers were instructed to provide detailed affidavits explaining why action was not taken against Patanjali under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act.
The court criticized the Uttarakhand State Licensing Authority for not taking action against the publications and advertisements.
Justice Amanullah highlighted that Mr. Ramdev violated the undertaking twice, once by holding a press conference the day after giving an undertaking, and later during the contempt hearing.
The court emphasized that the assurances of the State Licensing Authority and the apologies of the proposed contemnors were not credible, stating that such conduct makes a mockery of the Supreme Court.
Call for Accountability
Furthermore, the bench directed District Ayurvedic and Unani Officers in Haridwar to file affidavits explaining their inaction against Patanjali under the law.
The court’s scrutiny and the failure to accept the apologies have raised questions about accountability and compliance with regulations in the advertising of medical products by prominent figures in the industry.
Upholding the Law
The ongoing legal proceedings highlight the importance of upholding the law and ensuring transparency in advertising practices within the healthcare sector.
Article X-ray
Sources
Here are all the sources used to create this article:
Facts attribution
This section links each of the article’s facts back to its original source.
If you suspect false information in the article, you can use this section to investigate where it came from.
| thehindu.com |
|---|
| – The Supreme Court refused to accept the unconditional apology from Patanjali co-founder Baba Ramdev and managing director Acharya Balkrishna for advertising medical products in violation of an undertaking given in November 2023. – Contempt notice was issued against Patanjali Ayurved and Mr. Balkrishna on February 27. – Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah expressed dissatisfaction with the apology and called the violations deliberate and willful. – The contempt of court case was posted for April 16. – State Licensing Authority officers were ordered to file detailed affidavits on why action was not taken against Patanjali under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act. – Justice Amanullah mentioned that Mr. Ramdev violated the undertaking twice. – The court criticized the Uttarakhand State Licensing Authority for not taking action against the publications and advertisements. – The court said the assurances of the State Licensing Authority and the apology of the proposed contemnors are not trustworthy. – Justice Amanullah stated that such conduct makes a mockery of the Supreme Court. – The bench directed District Ayurvedic and Unani Officers in Haridwar to file affidavits explaining their inaction against Patanjali under the law. |
| thehindu.com |
|---|
| – The Supreme Court refused to accept the unconditional apology from Patanjali co-founder Baba Ramdev and managing director Acharya Balkrishna for advertising medical products in violation of an undertaking given in November 2023. – Contempt notice was issued against Patanjali Ayurved and Mr. Balkrishna on February 27. – Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah expressed dissatisfaction with the apology from Mr. Ramdev and Mr. Balkrishna, calling their violations deliberate and willful. – The contempt of court case was posted for April 16. – State Licensing Authority officers were ordered to file detailed affidavits on why action was not taken against Patanjali under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act. – Mr. Ramdev violated the undertaking twice, once by holding a press conference the day after giving an undertaking and later during the contempt hearing. – The court criticized the Uttarakhand State Licensing Authority for inaction in preventing publications and advertisements. – The court said the assurances of the State Licensing Authority and the apology of the proposed contemnors were not credible. – Justice Amanullah stated that such conduct makes a mockery of the Supreme Court. – The bench directed District Ayurvedic and Unani Officers in Haridwar to file affidavits explaining their inaction against Patanjali under the law. |
| thehindu.com |
|---|
| – The Supreme Court refused to accept the unconditional apology from Patanjali co-founder Baba Ramdev and managing director Acharya Balkrishna for advertising medical products in violation of an undertaking given in November 2023. – Contempt notice was issued against Patanjali Ayurved and Mr. Balkrishna on February 27. – Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah expressed dissatisfaction with the apology from Patanjali, Mr. Balkrishna, and Mr. Ramdev. – The contempt of court case was posted for April 16. – State Licensing Authority officers were ordered to file detailed affidavits on why action was not taken against Patanjali under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act. – Mr. Ramdev violated the undertaking twice, once by holding a press conference the day after giving an undertaking and later during the contempt hearing. – The court criticized the Uttarakhand State Licensing Authority for inaction against Patanjali. – The court said the assurances of the State Licensing Authority and the apology of the proposed contemnors were not credible. – Justice Amanullah said such conduct makes a mockery of the Supreme Court. – The bench directed District Ayurvedic and Unani Officers in Haridwar to file affidavits explaining their inaction against Patanjali under the law. |
| indianexpress.com |
|---|
| – Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna apologized to the Supreme Court for publishing misleading advertisements and criticizing allopathy – The court was upset about a press conference held by Ramdev on November 22, 2023, and an advertisement issued by the company on December 4, 2023 – Ramdev tendered an unconditional apology for the advertisements and assured the court that it would not be repeated – He also apologized for the press conference and promised not to make any public statements that breach the court’s undertaking – Acharya Balkrishna also apologized for the offending advertisements and promised not to issue similar ones in the future – He undertook to comply with the court’s statement and uphold the majesty of law and justice – The court had expressed discrepancies in the dates in the applications filed by Ramdev and Balkrishna seeking permission to appear virtually – They explained that they had instructed their travel agent to issue tickets and apologized for the lapse in their affidavit – They promised to be more vigilant in the future and assured the court of the genuineness of their statement about their travel arrangements |
