By NewsBlogger Former President Donald Trump’s legal team is requesting a delay in his upcoming criminal trial in New York related to hush money payments, citing a pending Supreme Court case on presidential immunity.
At a glance
- Trump’s legal team is seeking a delay in his upcoming criminal trial in New York related to hush money payments.
- This would be the first criminal case against a former US president.
- Attorneys are asking for a postponement until the US Supreme Court rules on Trump’s claim of immunity from prosecution.
- They argue that Trump’s statements about his former attorney and his Twitter account should be considered official acts protected by presidential immunity.
- Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which involve allegations of collaboration to suppress negative information about him in the 2016 election.
The details
Former President Donald Trump’s legal team is seeking a delay in his upcoming criminal trial in New York.
The trial, which is related to hush money payments made to an adult film star, is currently scheduled to begin on 25 March.
This would mark the first criminal case against a former US president.
Trump’s attorneys are asking the judge to postpone the trial until the US Supreme Court rules on his claim of immunity from prosecution in a separate case.
The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments regarding Trump’s immunity defense on 25 April, a month after the New York trial is slated to start.
A decision from the Supreme Court is not expected until several weeks after the oral arguments take place.
Trump’s legal team is arguing that his previous statements about his former attorney, Michael Cohen, in 2018 should be considered official acts protected by presidential immunity.
Additionally, they claim that Trump’s Twitter account served as an official communications channel during his time in office.
The attorneys have requested that the New York Judge delay the trial until the Supreme Court has had the opportunity to review the issue of presidential immunity.
They are also asking for a hearing to determine which evidence should be considered official acts covered by this immunity.
Donald Trump has entered a plea of not guilty to all charges in this case.
The allegations involve Trump, Cohen, and David Pecker allegedly collaborating to suppress negative information about Trump in order to bolster his chances in the 2016 election.
The prosecution may rely on testimony from Cohen, who made the payment to the adult film star just before the election and was later reimbursed by Trump.
Article X-ray
Sources
Here are all the sources used to create this article:
Facts attribution
This section links each of the article’s facts back to its original source.
If you suspect false information in the article, you can use this section to investigate where it came from.
| independent.co.uk |
|---|
| – Donald Trump’s attorneys are requesting the judge overseeing his criminal case in New York to postpone the trial until the US Supreme Court decides on his claim of “immunity” from prosecution in a separate case. – Jury selection for the criminal trial related to hush money payments to an adult film star is set for 25 March, marking the first criminal proceeding against a former president. – The Supreme Court will hear Trump’s arguments on his immunity defense on 25 April, a month after the New York trial is scheduled to begin. – A ruling from the Supreme Court is expected to come several weeks after the oral arguments. – Trump’s attorneys argue that his statements about his former attorney Michael Cohen in 2018 implicate official acts for purposes of presidential immunity. – Trump’s attorneys claim that his Twitter account was an official communications channel during his presidency. – Attorneys have asked the New York Judge to adjourn the trial until the Supreme Court reviews presidential immunity and then schedule a hearing to remove evidence considered official acts covered by that immunity. – Donald Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges. – Trump, Cohen, and David Pecker allegedly worked together to bury negative information about Trump to boost his electoral prospects. – The case may rely on testimony from Cohen, who made the payment to the adult film star just before the 2016 election and was later reimbursed by Trump. |
